The establishment liberal spin machine has been working overtime the last 24 hours to make it seem as though former acting DNC chair Donna Brazile had not admitted what she’d admitted in an excerpt from her book published by Politico on Thursday.
Their argument, if you can call it that, rests on the claim that a document which unquestionably shows inappropriate bias and collusion does not show inappropriate bias and collusion because it contains a paragraph which says the document should not be construed as containing inappropriate bias and collusion. This is really boring and stupid, but since the Clinton cult is circulating this nonsense all over social media I figure I should probably write something for people to refute it with.
— The Hill (@thehill) November 3, 2017
Turns out the memo Donna spoke about applied only to the general election. If so then this memo is standard operating procedure for 15 years https://t.co/fsU1kMZoSp
— Howard Dean (@GovHowardDean) November 3, 2017
“However, the memo also made clear that the arrangement pertained to only the general election”
A big detail! https://t.co/6RVYo3Siz9
— Chris Hayes (@chrislhayes) November 3, 2017
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) November 4, 2017
1. THREAD: JUST WOW. Look at the memo below. The entire Hillary “rigged” narrative blew up today. So will anyone face consequences? https://t.co/9pa2wSkads
— Peter Daou (@peterdaou) November 3, 2017
It makes sense that they’d want to lie about such a thing. A top-level DNC insider admitting to something that Sanders voters have been screaming for over a year, and admitting it to a large mainstream audience, is a very big deal. Admitting wrongdoing means having to make changes, and having to make changes could mean no longer being able to effectively sabotage the agendas of their progressive base, which would make the donors who control the Democratic party and the plutocrats who own the mainstream media unhappy.